Created 05/06/2012 - 1 year ago
On tonight's On The Record, one of the three Campbell Law professors who authored a paper defending the Marriage Amendment conceded he doesn't believe one of the primary arguments made by amendment backers.
Source
www.wral.comRT'd for AM: A high-profile Amendment backer doesn't believe it's needed to "protect marriage" in NC: http://t.co/pxHIV6pk #ncpol #ncga
RT @NCPW_daily_news: Amendment defender debunks 'activist judge' claim :: http://t.co/ZzC8OMlk http://t.co/xzP38RCc
RT @protectNC: It is clear that @Vote4MarriageNC is running a campaign of misinformation and scare tactics. http://t.co/UVY7zsTy #ncpol
SHARE EVERYWHERE: Amendment One defenders debunk their own 'activist judge' claim, thereby conceding their only... http://t.co/OzeGHMXh
In a nutshell: No, I do not think so." // #amendment1 proponents' arguments implode during interview w/ @wral http://t.co/rf6J7FPX
RT @sonofalink: Amendment 1 supporter debunks the flimsy "activist judge" claim. http://t.co/67fMguCK
RT @racetotheballot: SEE IT TO BELIEVE IT: #Amendment1 defenders debunk their own 'activist judge' claim @wral: http://t.co/SuzzcZ6O
RT @protectNC: .@Vote4MarriageNC's main spokesperson debunks "activist judge" claim http://t.co/UVY7zsTy #ncpol #amendment1
When key defenders of Amendment 1 in #NC are doubting it, why is it even on the ballot? @MHarrisPerry @msnbc #nerdland http://t.co/Mee0JvpO
#VoteAgainst #Amendment1 RT: Amendment defender debunks 'activist judge' claim :: http://t.co/KjYzniWL - http://t.co/XrROhyTR
Primary #Amendment1 defender conceded he doesn't believe one of the primary arguments advanced by its backers: http://t.co/m6SuNnth
A law prof. admits there's no impending move in NC judiciary 2overturn NC's current marriage law but insists... http://t.co/TuH5epS6
